Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Francis's avatar

Rereading this essay led me to investigate the Antioch rules for sexual consent, which I think miss the point. Sex is not about a legalistic contract but rather about navigating choices, feelings and a sense of what is right.

To place sex into a contractual framework is to make it confrontational and transactional rather than a loving engagement or an encounter. But consent has become the standard, and now for all who think this is the way to go, we have one foot in court or the student judiciary.

With consent as the standard, the entire realm of navigating choices and feelings is missed. The question of sex is not, do you consent? The question is, do you want this experience, do we have sufficient trust to proceed, is it right for you and is it right for us at this stage of our relating? And more creatively, what do you want to explore?

In any real sexual encounter, there is always a meeting with the unknown and the unfamiliar.

No posts

Ready for more?